Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism.

Objectives: To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year.

Results: The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009.

Conclusions: We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.

Objectives: To examine the quality and accuracy of diagnoses recorded in the ED in order to appraise its potential utility as a guage of the population's medical needs.

Methods: Using the Delphi process, a preliminary list of health indicators generated by an expert focus group was transformed into a query to the Ministry of Health's database. In parallel, medical charts were reviewed in four hospitals to compare the handwritten diagnosis in the medical record with that recorded on the standard diagnosis "pick list" coding sheet. Quantity and quality of coding were assessed using explicit criteria.

Results: During 2010 a total of 17,761 charts were reviewed; diagnoses were not coded in 42%. The accuracy of existing coding was excellent (mismatch 1%–5%). Database query (2,670,300 visits to 28 hospitals in 2009) demonstrated potential benefits of these data as indicators of regional health needs.

Conclusions: The findings suggest that an increase in the provision of community care may reduce ED attendance. Information on ED visits can be used to support health care planning. A "pick list" form with common diagnoses can facilitate quality recording of diagnoses in a busy ED, profiling the population’s health needs in order to optimize care. Better compliance with the directive to code diagnosis is desired.