Israel Medical Association Journal

The use of smaller-diameter, pencil-point spinal needles has increased to reduce post-dural puncture headaches in obstetric patients. However, this therapy has also led to more needle deformation and breakage. While risk factors and prevention are described, there is limited literature on management when breakage occurs.

The utilization of neuraxial techniques for labor analgesia and cesarean delivery has experienced a consistent increase in recent years [1]. Spinal anesthesia has emerged as the preferred technique for cesarean deliveries due to its advantages, including a reduction in morbidity and mortality, decreased complications related to airway management, reduced bleeding, improved bonding with the baby, and better outcomes for newborns [2]. While the adoption of smaller diameter, non-cutting bevel spinal needles has successfully reduced the incidence of post-dural puncture headaches in obstetric patients, it has also given rise to complications such as spinal needle deformation and breakage [3,4]. The current understanding of the incidence of neuraxial needle breakage remains limited, with estimated incidences reported between approximately 1 in 5,000 to 1 in 11,000 spinal anesthesia procedures performed [4]. Although numerous case reports have documented broken needles during attempted neuraxial anesthesia, the existing literature predominantly focuses on associated risk factors and preventive measures for this complication [3]. However, there is a lack of literature regarding the subsequent management once this adverse event has transpired. In this report, we present a case involving a broken spinal needle during an attempt to perform spinal anesthesia for an urgent cesarean delivery. By sharing this case, we shed light on the management strategies and considerations following such an event.

Background: Cesarean delivery (CD) is one of the most common surgeries performed worldwide, with increasing yearly rates. Although neuraxial techniques remain the preferred anesthesia method for CD, maternal thrombocytopenia remains a prominent contraindication. Formation of spinal\epidural hematomas are extremely rare, however the minimal thrombocyte count required for safe neuraxial anesthesia is still under debate. Although transfusion of thrombocytes for the purpose of neuraxial anesthesia is still not recommended, patients with severe thrombocytopenia (less than 50 × 10³/uL) are given thrombocyte transfusion for surgical hemostasis.

Objectives: To evaluate the anesthetic approach to caesarean deliveries in parturients with severe thrombocytopenia who received thrombocyte transfusion aimed for improved surgical hemostasis.

Methods: We conducted a single center, retrospective cohort study.

Results: A total of five cases were found, four of which were given spinal anesthesia immediately following thrombocyte transfusion. One patient was denied spinal anesthesia because her thrombocyte count following transfusion failed to reach safe levels. None of our cases had anesthesia-related complications recorded.

Conclusions: We examined the anesthetic management parturients with severe thrombocytopenia who needed cesarean delivery and were transfused with thrombocytes for surgical hemostasis. In such cases, spinal anesthesia may be considered due to the serious risks associated with general anesthesia.

Background: The incidence of spinal failure necessitating general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section is extremely low. Aspiration prophylaxis prior to spinal anesthesia is often recommended in case of spinal failure or excessive spinal block requiring the emergency administration of general anesthesia.

Objectives: To determine the incidence of endotracheal intubation following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the pen-operative course of parturients undergoing cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at our institution from February 1991 to December 1993. If spinal failure occurred, 10 ml of sodium bicarbonate was administered by mouth prior to induction of general anesthesia.

Results: Among the 743 cases that we reviewed, spinal failure occurred in 15 patients (2%) because of inadequate analgesia in 14 patients (1.9%) and unexpected prolonged surgery for hysterectomy in one patient (0.1%). No patient required intubation due to excessive spinal block. In none of the patients was a record of pulmonary aspiration identified.

Conclusions: The extremely low incidence of spinal failure or excessive block necessitating endotracheal intuba­tion suggests that routine aspiration prophylaxis may not be necessary prior to spinal anesthesia. However, these results should be confirmed by a prospective, controlled study on larger populations. An antacid should be readily available and administered whenever general anesthesia is required.