Israel Medical Association Journal

Idiopathic eosinophilic vasculitis is a newly recognized form of hypereosinophilic syndrome. While little is understood about the condition, criteria for its definition have been proposed. We aimed to determine whether three patients with eosinophilia and vasculitis could be retrospectively diagnosed with this condition. We performed a retrospective descriptive analysis on three cases with hypereosinophilia and vasculitis who were treated in Sheba Medical Center, Sourasky Medical Center, and Meir Medical Center in Israel between 2009 and 2021. A thorough review of all three cases was conducted. The findings were compared to the suggested criteria for idiopathic eosinophilic vasculitis.

All patients shared the symptoms of progressive limb ischemia, eosinophilic rash, and peripheral neuropathy that are consistent with vasculitis. No lower or upper respiratory abnormalities or the presence of anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) autoantibodies associated with eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis were detected. Primary monoclonal abnormalities, drug interactions, infections, allergy, and other secondary causes of hypereosinophilia were excluded. After a thorough review, we suggest that our three patients with previously unexplained hypereosinophilia and vasculitis fit the diagnosis of idiopathic eosinophilic vasculitis. These results highlight the existence of this novel condition and the importance of its recognition and consideration as part of the differential diagnosis in patients with marked eosinophilia and vasculitis. Further research for elucidating the mechanisms and treatment approach for this potentially severe condition is urgently needed.

Background: The most frequent cause of defect in the mandible is tumor-related surgery. Larger defects or anterior arch defects cause severe morbidity due to disturbances in function and aesthetics.

Objectives: To assess the outcome of free tissue transfer for mandible reconstruction.

Methods: Since 1998 we operated on 11 patients with mandible defects using the fibula flap as the reconstruction method. We performed immediate reconstruction in eight patients after ablative surgery, and late reconstruction due to radiation-induced complications in three.

Results: All patients achieved good functional and aesthetic outcome. During the follow-up period two patients died of their malignant disease and one patient died from a non-related cause. Although two patients underwent reoperation in the first 3 months after their primary operation due to fixation failure, there were no other major complications.

Conclusions: According to the literature and our limited experience, the fibula flap is a safe and reliable option for mandible reconstruction.