• IMA sites
  • IMAJ services
  • IMA journals
  • Follow us
  • Alternate Text Alternate Text
עמוד בית
Fri, 22.11.24

Search results


August 2010
A.E. Buchs and M.J. Rapoport

Background: It is currently recommended that capillary glucose levels of non-critically ill hospitalized diabetic patients be maintained at between 140 and 180 mg/dl. Implementation of these recommendations and evaluation of their effectiveness require that data regarding the glucose control of these hospitalized patients be accessible.

Objective: To analyze glucose control and monitoring of all the diabetic patients hospitalized in the general medicine wards of our medical center.

Methods: Capillary glucose measurements of all diabetic patients hospitalized in our departments of medicine between June and December 2008 were recorded by a central computerized institutional glucometer. Median glucose values and frequency of daily glucose checks per patient were analyzed in the internal medicine wards.

Results: We evaluated 14,366 capillary measurements from 2475 patients; 43% were taken before breakfast and 25% before dinner. A median of one daily determination per patient was obtained. This number increased 1.4-fold in patients with hyperglycemia > 200 mg/dl and 2.5-fold in patients with hypoglycemia. Seventy-five percent of the recorded glucose values were within the recommended target range, with a median daily level of 161 mg/dl and median fasting glucose of 142 mg/dl. A significant variance was found between wards.

Conclusions: The frequency of capillary glucose measurements in diabetic patients hospitalized in general medicine wards was low; most capillary glucose values, however, were within the recommended target range. The optimal monitoring of glucose in these patients remains to be determined.

May 2004
M. Rapoport

The 50th anniversary of the Israel Diabetes Association this year is a time less for celebration than for concern. The prevalence of diabetes is rapidly and alarmingly increasing in Westernized and developing countries around the world. Unfortunately, the majority of patients with diabetes do not meet their treatment goals – i.e., glucose, blood pressure or lipid levels. Moreover, our clinical experience and large longitudinal studies have taught us that the mean glucose levels of diabetic patients tend to increase over the years regardless of their treatment modalities. The appropriate answer to these somewhat frustrating data is that the medical community responsible for the integrated health of our diabetic patients – namely, physicians, researchers, nurses and dieticians – must use its combined resources and available therapeutic tools to optimize treatment for these patients. We should also deepen our understanding of the mechanisms underlying the various forms of diabetes and its complications in order to devise more efficient preventive measures for this prevalent devastating chronic disease.

This issue of IMAJ dedicated to diabetes provides some glimpses into these approaches. It contains relevant clinical management debates such as how and when insulin therapy should be instituted and which antihypertensive drugs are more appropriate in the treatment of diabetic nephropathy; a current state-of-the-art review of gestational diabetes as well as how to recognize and manage the diabetic Charcot foot. It exposes the reader to modern prevention strategies against type 1 and type 2 diabetes, to the search for alternative insulin-producing tissue, to advanced understanding of diabetic dermopathy, and more. It also includes selected abstracts of ongoing studies to be presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Israel Diabetes Association. Most of all, the high quality of the clinical and basic research presented herein strengthens our hope for a better future for our diabetic patients.

 

Micha Rapoport MD (Guest Editor)

Department of Internal Medicine C and the Diabetes Service, Assaf Harofeh Medical Center, Zerifin, Israel

 

Editorial Committee

Hilla Knobler MD (Debate Editor)

Eleazar Shafrir PhD

Efrat Wertheimer MD PhD

R.A. Slater, Y. Ramot, A. Buchs and M.J. Rapoport
November 2003
N. Tweezer-Zaks, E. Shiloach, A. Spivak, M. Rapoport, B. Novis and P. Langevitz
December 2002
Jayson Rapoport BSc MB MRCP, Alexander Kagan MD and Michael M. Friedlaender BM FRCP
July 2002
Jacob T. Cohen, MD, Gil Ziv, MD, PhD, Joseph Bloom, MD, Daniel Zikk, MD, Yoram Rapoport, MD and Mordechai Z. Himmelfarb, MD

Background: The ear is the most frequent organ affected during an explosion. Recognition of possible damage to its auditory and vestibular components, and particularly the recovery time of the incurred damage, may help in planning the optimal treatment strategies for the otologic manifestations of blast injury and preventing deleterious consequences.   

Objective: To report the results of the oto-vestibular initial evaluation and follow-up of 17 survivors of a suicidal terrorist attack on a municipal bus.

Methods: These 17 patients underwent periodic ear inspections and pure tone audiometry for 6 months. Balance studies, consisting of electronystagmography (ENG) and computerized dynamic posturography (CDP) were performed at the first time possible.

Results: Complaints of earache, aural fullness and tinnitus resolved, whereas dizziness persisted in most of the patients. By the end of the follow-up, 15 (55.6%) of the eardrum perforations had healed spontaneously. Hearing impairment was detected in 33 of the 34 tested ears. Recovery of hearing was complete in 6 ears and partial in another 11. ENG and CDP were performed in 13 patients: 5 had abnormal results on CDP while the ENG was normal in all the patients. The vertigo in seven patients resolved in only one patient who was free of symptoms 1 month after the explosion.

Conclusion:  Exposure to a high powered explosion in a confined space may result in severe auditory and vestibular damage. Awareness of these possible ear injuries may prevent many of the deleterious consequences of such injuries.
 

March 2002
Alexander Kagan, MD, Nurit Haran, PhD, Ludmila Leschinsky, MD, PhD, Ruty Sarafian, RN, BA, Dan Aravot, MD, Jaffa Dolberg, RN, Ziv Ben-Ary, MD and Jason Rapoport, MB, BS, MRCP

Background: Leptin is a 16 kDa hormone synthesized by adipocytes and involved in body weight regulation.

Objectives: To determine serum leptin concentrations in heart, liver and kidney transplant recipients.

Methods: We investigated 57 patients: 18 male heart transplant recipients (age 25-69 years) at 1-66 months after transplantation, 6 female and 8 male liver transplant recipients (age 33-70) at 11-73 months after transplantation, and 10 female and 15 male kidney transplant recipients (age 20-61) at 3-138 months after transplantation. All recipients were receiving immunosuppressive therapy, including prednisone 0-20 mg/day, azathioprine 75-125 mg/day, cyclosporin 100-250 mg/day or tacrolimus 2-10 mg/day. The results were compared to those of 10 female and 10 male healthy controls. Morning serum concentrations of leptin were measured with a commercial radioimmunoassay (Linco Research Inc., USA), and serum insulin and cortisol levels were measured by radioimmunoassay.

Results: Patients (both men and women) after heart, liver and kidney transplantation exhibited significantly higher serum concentrations of leptin and leptin/body mass index ratios than controls. Serum leptin concentrations were significantly higher in women than in men and correlated very significantly with BMI[1] in all cases. The multivariate stepwise analyses showed that among parameters including BMI, gender, age, time after transplantation, prednisone dose, hematocrit, serum concentrations of glucose, albumin, creatinine, cortisol and insulin, only BMI, gender, cortisol and insulin were significant independent determinants of serum leptin levels in these patients.

Conclusions: This is the first report showing that, in addition to body mass index and gender, basal cortisol and insulin levels affect the hyperleptinemia in transplant patients. The clinical relevance of hyperleptinemia in these patients will require further investigation.






[1] BMI = body mass index



 
January 2001
Robert Slater, DPM Yoram Ramot, MD and Micha Rapoport, MD
December 2000
Jayson Rapoport, MB, BS, MRCP
Legal Disclaimer: The information contained in this website is provided for informational purposes only, and should not be construed as legal or medical advice on any matter.
The IMA is not responsible for and expressly disclaims liability for damages of any kind arising from the use of or reliance on information contained within the site.
© All rights to information on this site are reserved and are the property of the Israeli Medical Association. Privacy policy

2 Twin Towers, 35 Jabotinsky, POB 4292, Ramat Gan 5251108 Israel