תוצאת חיפוש

נטע נוצר, רות אברמוביץ

היחידה לחינוך רפואי, הפקולטה לרפואה, אוניברסיטת תל אביב

השנה מלאו מאה שנים למהפכה שעבר החינוך הרפואי להכשרת הסטודנט לרפואה בארה"ב ובקנדה; מהפכה זו התרחשה בעקבות דו"ח פלקסנר, שקרא להעמיד את ההכשרה על בסיס אקדמי ומחקרי, ולשלבה במצוינות ההדרכה הקלינית.

Correlation between Success in Specialty Examinations and Learning Methods of Family Medicine Residents

Netta Notzer, Dahlia Megiddo, Ruth Abramowitz, Michael Weingarten

Medical Education Unit, Family Medicine Section, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University

Learning methods chosen by residents in family medicine during their residency and the correlation between them and achievement in the written specialty exams (Stage 1) were investigated. The learning patterns studied were: structured learning (certification course, study with a tutor, staff meetings, conferences) and self-learning (textbooks, journals, the Hebrew publication "Update," and audio tapes). Of 184 residents who took the examination in 1994-5, 104 responded to a questionnaire as to preferences for the various learning aids and satisfaction with their use. There was no correlation between use of a given learning method and success in the examination. Significantly more candidates preferred self-learning, especially among those who were successful, but also among some who failed the examination. There was no direct connection between the examination and the high level requirements of the residency program, for which up-to-date, integrated knowledge based on self-learning is needed.

Use of Student Feedback by Pre-Clinical and Clinical Course Directors

Ruth Abramowitz, Netta Notzer

Medical Education Unit, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University

We examined the conceptual and instrumental uses of student feedback on teaching by 2 preclinical and clinical course directors with authority to change structure and content of the courses, assess suitability of instructors and to change methods of student feedback questionnaires have been collected systematically for over 2 decades. A report based on this feedback is sent to course directors, the dean, his assistants and the head of the curriculum committee. Course directors from both groups made broad use of the feedback but made greater use of the report than preclinical course directors. Students had greater regard for individual teaching by clinical course directors than by preclinical course coordinators. No relationship was found between the degree of use of feedback by members of either group and their level of teaching. We conclude that senior faculty use student feedback in their decisions regarding the structure and teaching methods of their courses and are not influenced by individual assessments, positive or negative, by their students.