Israel Medical Association Journal

Long-term sperm preservation plays a pivotal role in providing a lifeline for individuals grappling with medical and fertility challenges; thus, enabling them to pursue their aspirations of parenthood. While the significance of frozen sperm is unquestionable, it is vital to address the persistently low utilization and disposal rates of stored samples over time and resulting in an unintended accumulation of unclaimed doses. This accumulation not only carries significant medical, legal, and financial burdens for the institutions responsible, such as sperm banks, but also raises complex ethical considerations, particularly concerning potential biological paternity. These multifaceted considerations are particularly relevant within Israel's publicly funded healthcare system, accentuating the need for clearly defined preservation criteria in cases where an immediate clinical necessity is not readily apparent. We highlight the important clinical, ethical, and economic aspects of preserving the potential for biological paternity and efficiently managing the resources and responsibilities associated with long-term sperm preservation.

Background: Sperm banks initially focused on providing sperm donation (SD) to heterosexual couples grappling with severe male infertility. Notable advancements in fertility treatments and sociological trends have broadened the scope of SD toward single women and same sex female couples.

Objectives: To evaluate SD recipient characteristics over the last three decades in Israel according to demographic parameters.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 5489 women who received SD between January 1992 and December 2021 from a tertiary referral center. We divided the overall period into six groups of five years each. A comparison of demographic characteristics of women who received SD in different periods was performed according to age at the beginning of the treatment, marital status (single women and same sex female couples, heterosexual couples), and ethnic origin.

Results: The average age of women who received SD was 37.02 ± 5.36 years. The average patient age rose from 35.08 years in 1992–1997 to 37.43 years in 2017–2021 (P-value < 0.01). The use of SD was more common among single women and same sex female couples compared to heterosexual couples in later years. Regarding single and same sex female couple, the percentage of SD recipients increased radically from 33% to 88.1% (P-value < 0.01).

Conclusions: Modern sperm banks treat older patients in non-heterosexual relationships. These trends encompass not only medical implications (e.g., in vitro fertilization vs. intrauterine insemination) but also delve into the personal and sociological impact experienced by both patients and offspring.