Israel Medical Association Journal

The emergence of the hybrid hospital represents a paradigm shift, blending the physical and virtual realms to optimize healthcare delivery. Telehealth made its significant entrance into the health systems during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. The use of a variety of telehealth initiatives increased during the COVID-19 pandemic. Approximately 8% of primary care visits in the United States are by telehealth. Despite the rapid growth of telehealth, several barriers persist. Technological limitations, regulatory challenges, and resistance to change among both healthcare providers and patients pose hurdles to the widespread adoption of telehealth services. A significant concern in the healthcare digital evolution is the digital divide. Socioeconomic factors, such as limited access to high-speed internet and digital devices, can exacerbate existing healthcare disparities. An important part of the hybrid hospital is home hospitalization, which is an alternative to regular hospitalization. This method opens access to big, tertiary, academic centers to remote populations and advances treatment equity. Home hospitalization has become available in several countries such as Australia, China, and the United States, with impressive results for peripheral, remote populations. According to the McKenzie Report, virtual hospitals have the potential to ease busy health systems, make more hospital beds available, decrease the need for building physical hospitals, and save millions of dollars. Hybrid hospitals and telehealth are here to stay. The medical community should study the risks and opportunities and establish guidelines for proper, quality, and safe management.

Background: Monitoring the rate of infections in individual centers that treat patients with hematological malignancies is of major importance. However, there are no uniform guidelines for infection surveillance.

Objectives: To describe the epidemiology of bacterial and fungal infections in a single hematology ward and to compare methods for reporting surveillance and infection rates in other centers in Israel.

Methods: We conducted a prospective surveillance of all patients admitted to our hematology ward, applying standard definitions for invasive fungal infections and adapting definitions for non-fungal infections. Incidence rates were calculated using patients, admissions, hospital days and neutropenia days. We performed a search for other reported surveillance studies in Israel.

Results: We detected 79 infectious episodes among 159 patients admitted to the hematology ward during 1 year. Using neutropenia days as the denominator for calculation of incidence discriminated best between patients at high and low risk for infection. The incidence of invasive fungal infections was 7, 10 and 18 per 1000 neutropenia days, among all patients, those with acute leukemia and those with acute leukemia undergoing induction therapy, respectively. Only 10 reports from Israel were identified, 6 of which were prospective. Our data could not be compared to these reports because of the varying definitions and denominators used.

Conclusions: Hematology centers should monitor infection rates and report them in a uniform methodology.