Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients represent a particularly vulnerable group due to their reliance on immunosuppressive therapies. Previous studies indicated a mortality rate of 20%-30% among SOT recipients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). With the advent of the Omicron variant in November 2021, characterized by milder symptoms and lower mortality rates in the general population, safety measures relaxed, potentially impacting vulnerable populations like SOT recipients.

Objectives: To investigate mortality and morbidity among hospitalized SOT recipients with COVID-19 infection during the Omicron wave.

Methods: A retrospective, propensity-matched cohort study conducted at the Rabin Medical Center, Israel, spanned from November 2021 to June 2023. Adult SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 were compared to matched controls.

Results: Among 139 hospitalized SOT recipients and 209 controls, SOT recipients hospitalized with COVID-19 displayed higher in-hospital mortality (19% vs. 11%) and 90-day all-cause mortality (30% vs. 17%). In addition, the 90-day readmission rate was significantly higher among SOT recipients (43% vs. 31%). Multivariable analysis confirmed these trends, with SOT recipients exhibiting increased risk for mortality, readmission, invasive ventilation, and intensive care unit admission.

Conclusions: The heightened vulnerability of hospitalized SOT recipients during the Omicron wave was characterized by higher mortality and readmission rates compared to matched controls. Despite the perceived milder nature of the Omicron variant, SOT recipients remain disproportionately affected. Continued vigilance and targeted interventions are necessary for this population including vaccinations and adherence to preventive measures. Investigating this population’s outcomes through the changing COVID-19 variants is still warranted.

Background: Enterovirus meningitis (EM) is a common central nervous system (CNS) infection with a seasonal peak in summer and fall.

Objective: To describe the epidemiologic and clinical patterns of EM in children before (2017–2019 years) and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic (2020–2022).

Methods: This retrospective study included children (age 0–16 years) hospitalized in a pediatric department in Israel diagnosed with EM: January 2017–December 2019 and January 2020–December 2022. The seasonal peak for each period was defined as the maximal incidence in particular months. EM was diagnosed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for enteroviruses.

Results: During the study period, EM was diagnosed in 134 cases (median age 5 months [1–51], 76 [57%] males); 72 during 2017–2019 and 62 during 2020–2022. The most common presentation was fever. C-reactive protein (CRP) was elevated in 57 cases (43%). CSF profile showed pleocytosis in 130 cases (97%) and elevated protein in 80 (60%). In the 2020–2022 group, fewer patients were febrile, CRP was higher, and CSF profile showed a higher glucose level compared to the 2017–2019 group. Seasonal peaks in 2017–2019 occurred June–August, and in 2020–2022 February–April.

Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic altered the clinical characteristics of EM and its seasonal peak. Clinicians should be aware of changes in epidemiological patterns of EM to make appropriate diagnoses in viral infection in order to avoid unnecessary antibiotic treatment.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory illness with broad spectrum of clinical manifestations ranging from asymptomatic cases to severe complications such as acute respiratory failure, multi-organ dysfunction, and death.

Objectives: To evaluate the platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) as a marker of disease severity and mortality in COVID-19 patients. To explore the relationship between PLR and other inflammatory indicators, specifically C-reactive protein (CRP) and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

Methods: The cohort included 400 patients (206 males, 194 females; mean age: 64.5 ± 17.1 years [range 20–100 years]) who were hospitalized between April 2020 and December 2021. Data were collected on demographic and clinical characteristics, including ward and critical care details. CRP, NLR, and PLR values were recorded on the first and last days of hospitalization. Patients were categorized based on their hospitalization outcomes.

Results: PLR statistically increased during hospitalization, from 245 ± 160 at admission to 341 ± 747 at discharge (P < 0.001). A significant association was found between PLR and both the length of hospital stay and mortality. The mean PLR in the deceased group was 445 ± 590, compared to 304 ± 795 in the survivors, P = 0.007. This finding showed a correlation between higher PLR and increased severity and mortality.

Conclusion: PLR has been identified as a relevant marker for assessing the severity of COVID-19. Elevated PLR levels are associated with cytokine storm, length of hospital stay, and mortality. The results highlight the relationship between elevated PLR and poor outcome in COVID‐19 patients, suggesting its use in monitoring disease progression and prognosis.

Background: The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) disease pathway is heavily influenced by different inflammatory cytokines. There is ample evidence of cannabidiol (CBD) immunomodulation effects.

Objectives: To investigate the effect of CBD on patients with SARS-CoV-2 and to measure the impact on inflammatory cytokines.

Methods: A double blind, placebo-controlled study to compare the clinical outcomes and selected serum cytokine levels in patients with SARS-CoV-2 that received sublingual CBD extraction. Seven patients were randomized to the treatment arm and three to the placebo group.

Results: Clinical outcomes were better in the patient group that received sublingual CBD vs. patients receiving placebo treatment. Serum cytokine mean concentration levels showed differences between the two groups but of mixed trends.

Conclusions: Patients presenting with SARS-CoV-2 and receiving CBD sublingually had better outcomes than those receiving a placebo, although these results did not reflect in selected serum cytokines. Further study is needed.

Background: Burnout is prevalent among healthcare providers and characterized by emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and reduced personal accomplishment. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic exacerbated burnout due to increased workloads, emotional strain, and heightened risk. Complementary medicine (CAM) interventions like shiatsu massage and reflexology have been explored as potential to mitigate burnout, particularly pandemic-related stress.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy of CAM interventions for alleviating burnout in healthcare providers treating COVID-19 patients during 2022, when the Delta variant was prevalent.

Methods: This prospective observational study included 86 healthcare providers at Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus. Workers were divided into two groups: an intervention group participating in CAM activities and a control group. Participant burnout and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms were evaluated using the Maslach Burnout Inventory and General Anxiety Disorder 7 at baseline and at one day and one week post-intervention.

Results: The CAM group demonstrated significant reduction in burnout scores, primarily due to an enhanced sense of accomplishment (P = 0.023), with enduring effects observed after one week, although not reaching statistical significance (P = 0.078). There was no observed difference in PTSD scores between the groups (P = 0.28).

Conclusions: The study reveals potential benefits of CAM interventions in reducing burnout symptoms among healthcare providers during the COVID-19 pandemic. The findings underscore the importance of integrating such interventions to address the mental well-being of healthcare providers, especially in high-stress environments. Further randomized controlled trials with diverse samples and extended follow-up are recommended to validate and explore these initial findings.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic showed the need to evaluate disease severity promptly at the time of hospital admission. 

Objectives: To establish an admission protocol, which included clinical and laboratory findings. 

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study at Wolfson Medical Center, Israel, for a period of 19 months (2020–2021). We established a protocol for patients who were admitted with COVID-19 infection. The protocol parameters included demographic data, co-morbidities, immune status, oxygen level at room air on admission, oxygen demand, lymphopenia, C-reactive protein (CRP) level, lactate dehydrogenase, D-DIMER, creatinine, aspartate transferase, alanine aminotransferase, and ferritin. Based on this protocol, we defined the severity of COVID-19 at the beginning of hospitalization and started treatment without delay. This protocol included ferritin levels as a guide to severity and outcome of patients. A database was established for all the parameters of the patients included in the study. 

Results: The study included 407 patients; 207 males (50.9%), 200 females (49.1%). The age range was 18–101 years. Hyperferritinemia (> 1000 ng/dl) was one of the strongest and most significant predictors for severe disease in these patients (P < 0.001). Lymphopenia, high levels of CRP, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate transferase, lactate dehydrogenase, and creatinine also correlated with severe disease, complications, and death. 

Conclusions: Abnormal ferritin levels were a very significant and clear indicator of the development of severe COVID-19. The addition of ferritin levels to our protocol aided in finding which patients were at increased risk for morbidity and mortality.

Background: Prognostication is complex in patients critically ill with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).

Objectives: To describe the natural history of ventilated critical COVID-19 patients.

Methods: Due to our legal milieu, active withdrawal of care is not permitted, providing an opportunity to examine the natural history of ventilated critical COVID-19 patients. This retrospective cohort included COVID-19 ICU patients who required mechanical ventilation. Respiratory and laboratory parameters were followed from initiation of mechanical ventilation for 14 days or until extubation, death or tracheostomy.

Results: A total of 112 patients were included in the analysis. Surviving patients were younger than non-survivors (62 years [range 54–69] vs. 66 years [range 62–71], P = 0.01). Survivors had a shorter time to intubation, shorter ventilation duration, and longer hospital stay. Respiratory parameters at intubation were not predictive of mortality. Nevertheless, on ventilation day 10, many of the ventilatory parameters were significantly better in survivors. Regarding laboratory parameters, neutrophil counts were significantly higher in non-survivors on day 1 and C-reactive protein levels were significantly lower in survivors on day 10. Modeling using a generalized estimating equation showed small dynamic differences in ventilatory parameters predictive of survival.

Conclusions: In ventilated COVID-19 patients when there is no active care withdrawal, prognostication may be possible after a week; however, differences between survivors and non-survivors remain small.

Background: The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on patient populations can be divided to direct consequences of the disease and indirect implications of changes imposed on the national healthcare systems. The impact of the later survival of chronic hemodialysis patients is still unknown.

Objectives: To examine the impact of quarantine on health outcomes of dialysis patients.

Methods: In a retrospective case-controlled study, we compared chronic hemodialysis patients from two separate timeframes: during a quarantine period and a parallel time without quarantine.

Results: The study included 344 hemodialysis patients. Baseline characteristics were compared between those enrolled in 2015 and those enrolled in 2020. Despite comparable clinical parameters, a statistically significant increase in the 6-month mortality rate was observed in 2020 (1.2% vs. 6.7%, P = 0.01), primarily attributed to sepsis. Notably, no deaths were attributed to COVID-19 in 2020. Interdialytic weight gain and dialysis quality remained similar between the two groups, with a mild trend toward excessive weight gain in 2020. Secondary outcomes after 6 months did not significantly differ, except for lower sodium values in 2015 compared to 2020.

Conclusions: Dialysis patients experienced disproportionate effects from the COVID-19 pandemic, even with continuous care and no direct virus-related fatalities. The findings showed unintended consequences of quarantine measures, highlighting adverse impact on both physical and mental health. Recognizing and addressing these consequences are imperative for minimizing their impact in future pandemics, emphasizing the importance of proactive measures in healthcare planning.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic posed significant challenges to healthcare systems worldwide, including a surge in the use of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO).

Objectives: To compare outcomes and costs of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 adult patients treated with ECMO in the intensive care unit (ICU) at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective study. Clinical outcomes, ECMO duration, ICU and hospital length of stay (LOS), and healthcare costs were examined and compared between the two groups.

Results: A total of 119 patients were treated with ECMO between 2016 and 2023; 56 (47.1%) diagnosed with COVID-19. The study found no significant difference in mortality rates between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. However, COVID-19 patients experienced significantly longer ECMO durations and ICU LOS. Hospitalization and ECMO operation costs were notably higher for COVID-19 patients, but overall admission costs were lower compared to non-COVID-19 patients, with cost of surgical interventions, consultations and imaging contributing to the price gap.

Conclusions: Despite longer durations of ECMO and LOS, the economic burden of ECMO in COVID-19 patients was significantly lower than non-COVID-19 patients. Strict patient selection should be utilized, a fortiori during times of surge-capacity.

Background: Patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves must be treated with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) due to an increased risk of valve thrombosis and systemic embolism.

Objectives: To assess the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on VKA treatment control in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective nationwide cohort study using the Clalit Health Services database. The cohort included patients who underwent either aortic or mitral valve replacement using a prosthetic mechanical valve. The primary outcomes included the overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) and the percent of patients with a TTR < 50% during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to preceding year.

Results: The cohort included 2381 patients. The percentage of patients who had at least two international normalized ratio (INR) tests during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic was significantly lower compared to the year preceding the pandemic (81% and 87%, respectively, P < 0.001). In both years, the percentage of patients without any documented INR test was high (31.5% in the first COVID-19 pandemic year and 28.9% in the preceding year, P < 0.001). TTR was significantly lower during the 1st year of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the preceding year (68.1% ± 26 and 69.4% ± 24, P = 0.03). A TTR > 50% was demonstrated in 78% and 81% during the pandemic and the preceding year, P = 0.009.

Conclusions: We noted overall poor VKA control in patients with mechanical heart valves. During the COVID-19 pandemic, VKA control became even worse as reflected by significantly lower TTR and INR tests rates.

Background: Data regarding the management of adnexal torsion (AT) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic are scarce.

Objectives: To study the effects of actions to limit the spread of COVID-19 on AT management.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all women who underwent laparoscopy for suspected AT between March 2011 and February 2021. We compared the COVID-19 pandemic period, (15 March 2020–2 August 2021, group A) to a parallel period (2019–2020, group B), and a 9-year period preceding the pandemic (March 2011–February 2020, group C).

Results: We performed 97 laparoscopies in group A, 82 in group B, and 635 in group C. The proportion of women presenting following in vitro fertilization treatment was lower (odds ratio [OR] 0.22, 95% confidence interval ]95%CI] (0.06–0.86), P < 0.023). Time from admission to decision to operate was shorter (2.7 vs. 3.9 hours, P = 0.028) in group A than group B. Time from admission to surgery was shorter (9.1 vs. 12.5 hours, P = 0.005) and the rate of surgically confirmed AT was lower (59 [60.8%] vs. 455 [71.7%], P = 0.030, OR 0.61, 95%CI 0.39–0.95) in group A than group C. Among surgically confirmed AT cases only, mean time from admission to decision was shorter in group A than group B (2.6 vs. 4.6 hours, P = 0.014).

Conclusions: We identified differences in time from admission to clinical decision and from admission to surgery among women with suspected AT during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Background: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic caused significant global turmoil, including changes in social and societal conduct such as lockdowns, social isolation, and extensive regulations. These changes can be major sources of stress. The first wave of the pandemic (April–May 2020) was a time of global uncertainty. We evaluated symptom severity among 29 Israeli children and adolescents with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Our previous study found that most of these participants did not experience an exacerbation of symptoms.

Objective: To re-evaluate the OCD symptoms of 18 participants from the original group of 29 children and adolescents during three time points: before the pandemic, during the first wave, and 2 years later.

Methods: Obsessive-compulsive symptoms (OCS) were assessed using the Clinical Global Impression Scale (CGI), a functional questionnaire, and the Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-child version (OCI-CV).

Results: OCS in patients did not change significantly during the three time points. Participants reported minimal changes in their general functioning 2 years after the outbreak of COVID-19 and showed minimal change in OCI-CV scale scores.

Conclusions: Our results indicated clinical stability of OCD symptoms among most of the participants.

Background: Pregnant women are at higher risk for severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Since the release of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine (Pfizer/BioNTech), there has been accumulated data about the three vaccine doses. However, information regarding obstetric and neonatal outcomes of pregnant women vaccinated with the third (booster) vaccine is limited and primarily retrospective.

Objectives: To evaluate the obstetric and early neonatal outcomes of pregnant women vaccinated during pregnancy with the COVID-19 booster vaccine compared to pregnant women vaccinated only by the first two doses.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study of pregnant women who received the BNT162b2 vaccine during pregnancy. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes were compared between pregnant women who received only the first two doses of the vaccine to those who also received the booster dose.

Results: Overall, 139 pregnant women were vaccinated during pregnancy with the first two doses of the vaccine and 84 with the third dose. The third dose group received the vaccine earlier during their pregnancy compared to the two doses group (21² vs. 31⁵ weeks, respectively, P < 0.001). No differences in obstetric and early neonatal outcomes between the groups were found except for lower rates of urgent cesarean delivery in the third dose group (adjusted odds ratio 0.21; 95% confidence interval 0.048–0.926, P = 0.039).

Conclusions: Compared to the first two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine given in pregnancy, the booster vaccination is safe and not associated with an increased rate of adverse obstetric and early neonatal outcomes.

Background: At the beginning of 2020, the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic presented a new burden on healthcare systems.

Objectives: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the outcome of non-COVID patients in Israel.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study at a tertiary medical center in Israel. From December 2018 until June 2022, 6796 patients were hospitalized in the internal medicine wards. Patients were grouped based on their admission date: admitted during COVID waves (waves group), admitted between waves (interim group), and admitted during the same months in the previous year (former-year group).

Results: Mortality during hospitalization and 30-day mortality were higher in the waves group compared to the interim and former-year groups (41.4% vs. 30.5% and 24%, 19.4% vs. 17.9% and 12.9%, P < 0.001). In addition, 1-year mortality was higher in the interim group than in the waves and former-year group (39.1 % vs. 32.5% and 33.4%, P = 0.002). There were significant differences in the readmissions, both at 1 year and total number. The waves group had higher rates of mechanical ventilation and noradrenaline administration during hospitalization. Moreover, the waves group exhibited higher troponin levels, lower hemoglobin levels, and more abnormalities in liver and kidney function.

Conclusions: Hospitalized non-COVID patients experienced worse outcomes during the peaks of the pandemic compared to the nadirs and the preceding year, perhaps due to the limited availability of resources. These results underscore the importance of preparing for large-scale threats and implementing effective resource allocation policies.

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurological emergency requiring immediate evaluation and management to prevent significant morbidity or mortality. Previously, status epilepticus was defined as a seizure with a duration equal to or greater than 30 minutes or a series of seizures in which the patient does not regain normal mental status between seizures. The Neurocritical Care Society guidelines from 2012 revised the definition to a seizure with 5 minutes or more of continuous clinical and/or electrographic seizure activity or recurrent seizure activity without recovery between seizures.

Status epilepticus may be convulsive, non-convulsive, focal motor, or myoclonic, and any can become refractory. Convulsive status epilepticus consists of generalized tonic-clonic movements and mental status impairment. Non-convulsive status epilepticus is defined as seizure activity identified on an electroencephalogram with no accompanying tonic-clonic movements. Focal motor status epilepticus involves the refractory motor activity of a limb or a group of muscles on one side of the body with or without loss of consciousness. Refractory status epilepticus refers to continuing seizures (convulsive or non-convulsive) despite appropriate antiepileptic drugs [1].