Israel Medical Association Journal

Background: Acute cholecystitis (ACC) is one of the most common diagnoses encountered in surgical wards. A number of treatment modalities are available, and various guidelines have been developed to help decision making. Many factors influence treatment strategies, including patient age and frailty. Due to the increasing proportion of older patients, consideration into the best treatment modalities for this population are warranted.

Objectives: To determine outcomes of elderly patients with ACC according to different treatment strategies.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive patients aged ≥ 80 years who were admitted with a diagnosis of ACC between 2015 and 2019 to a single academic center. Patients were divided into three groups according to treatment: percutaneous cholecystostomy tube placement, cholecystectomy, intravenous antibiotic treatment only.

Results: Overall, 466 patients were included in the cohort. The majority (approximately 75%) were treated with antibiotics only, 17% underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy, and 8% underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. One-year mortality was 28.1%. The highest mortality rate was 41.6% in the cholecystostomy group (P = 0.002). In multivariable analysis age, functional status, C-reactive protein, and albumin levels were found to be independent risk factors for 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR] 1.08, 0.56, 0.98, 0.4, respectively). Cholecystostomy increased risk of one-year mortality compared to cholecystectomy and antibiotics alone (HR 0.61, 0.23, respectively).

Conclusions: The use of cholecystostomy for ACC in older adults is an independent risk factor for 1-year mortality. Its use in older adults should be reserved for carefully selected cases.

Background: Prophylaxis for hospitalized venous-thromboembolic events (VTEs) is frequently underutilized, in part due to lack of a simple risk assessment model (RAM). 

Objectives: To compare patient selection and administration of VTE prophylaxis according to the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) 2008 guidelines versus the newer 2012 guidelines, and assess the feasibility of developing simpler local RAMs.

Methods: We conducted a prospective assessment of VTE risk among 300 unselected consecutive patients admitted to a medical hospital ward, using the 2008 and 2012 ACCP guidelines. The frequency and relative weight of each risk factor in the 2012 ACCP guidelines were used to develop a local VTE RAM.

Results: VTE prophylaxis was indicated by the 2008 and 2012 ACCP guidelines in 40% and 42% of the cohort respectively, and was administered in 28% and 26% of eligible patients, respectively. Contraindication to VTE prophylaxis was found in 29% of patients according to both guidelines. In comparison to the 2008 guidelines, sensitivity and specificity of the 2012 guidelines were 96% and 88%, respectively. A local RAM based on the following concise score, comprising age, malignancy and immobility, correctly identified 99% of at-risk patients based on the 2012 guidelines, with a sensitivity and specificity of 98% and 95%, respectively.

Conclusions: Both guidelines performed to a similar degree and were poorly implemented in daily practice. A simplified RAM accurately identified the vast majority of these eligible patients. The development of local RAMs is feasible and may result in higher utilization rates.